Blue Commonwealth Logo

Advanced Search
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Become a Supporter
Like Blue Commonwealth? Want to help keep it running?
Contribute Today, and help keep our blog ad free!




Blog Roll
7 West
Albo Must Go
Anonymous is a Woman
Anti-BVBL
Article XI
Assembly Access
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Blacknell
Blue Ridge Data
Blue Virginia
Blueweeds
Byrne-ing Up the Internet
Central VA Progressive
ChangeServant
Coarse Cracked Corn
CobaltVA
CvilleDave
The Daily Dogwood
Dem Bones
DemocracyUpsideDown
DemRulz
Equality Loudoun
Fairfax City Dems
WaPo - The Fix
Fred2Blue
Getting Around
Great Blue Heron
The Green Miles
Heartland of Va
Leesburg Tomorrow
Left of the Hill
New Dominion Project
Not Larry Sabato
Ox Road South Blog
Penning Thoughts
Powhatan Democrats
Renaissance Ruminations
River City Rapids
Rule .303
RockDem
Shad Plank
Sisyphus
SlantBlog
Southeast Virginia
Star City Harbinger
Tokatakiya
Too Progressive
United States of Jamerica
VB Dems
VB Progressives
Virginia Dem
The Virginia Democrat
WaPo - Virginia Politics Blog
Vivian Paige
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll
xcurmudgeon

A President Breaks Hearts in Appalachia

by: teacherken

Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 07:50:43 AM EDT


( - promoted by KathyinBlacksburg)

originally posted at Daily Kos

Mountaintop removal coal mining is the worst environmental tragedy in American history. When will the Obama administration finally stop this Appalachian apocalypse?

So begins an op ed in today's Washington Post.  The title is the same as that of this this diary, A President Breaks Hearts in Appalachia

The author writes

My father visited Appalachia in 1966 and was so horrified by strip mining -- then in its infancy -- that he made it a key priority of his political agenda. He complained that Appalachia, with our nation's richest natural resources, was home to America's poorest populations, its worst education system, and its highest illiteracy and unemployment rates. These statistics are even grimmer today as mining saps state wealth.
He bears his father's name.

And if you do nothing else this morning, please stop and read the op ed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.  

teacherken :: A President Breaks Hearts in Appalachia
Have you read the WHOLE column?  If not, please, go back and do so.

I am not going to offer extensive quotes, because you need to read the material in context.

I will note that immediately after the 2nd passage I quote Kennedy points out that when his father visited Appalachia, 44,000 46,000 people earned their living by coal mining, but now that figure is fewer than 11,000, less than are employed in the Walmarts within the state.  

Kennedy goes through 6 current legal requirements he says can be used now to stop mountaintop removal.  Let me note only the fifth:  

the Clean Water Act requires mining operators to prove that they can restore the "function and structure" of affected streams. Operators have never been compelled to make the functional or structural analyses of the aquatic ecosystem required by the act. Obama should order his officials to stop ignoring this requirement.

Of course the coal operators cannot meet this requirement- or realistically, any of the others.   Which means insisting upon obeying the law would stop mountaintop removal now.

2,500 hundred tons of explosives daily, or as Kennedy notes, the equivalent of one Hiroshima bomb weekly . . .

500 mountains destroyed already . . . .

2000 miles of Appalachian streams interred under the fill waste . . . .

Those mountains are billions hundreds of millions (h/t my stupid opinion at Dailykos) of years old.  They cannot be restored.

The bio diversity was perhaps as rich as any place in the lower 48 states.  It is being irreversibly diminished as habitat is lost.

There are many issues facing this nation.  We do face an economic crisis.  We have pressures to move away from dependence upon foreign oil.  Some will use the current crises to oppose any change the current way we extract and use coal.  They will argue it will cost too much, it will make coal, and thus electricity, too expensive.

But they are providing inaccurate cost figures.   They are not paying for those ancient mountains gouged out, for the once pure streams blocked and buried, for the trees and shrubs and the wildlife that live on them lost forever.

For too long we have not required proper costing of ecological impact, any more than we have included in the price of our food and beverage the long-term medical costs they impose "downstream" -   a term hard to use in the context of mountaintop removal when so many streams no longer pass water "downstream". . .

Perhaps were we honest enough to account for such costs, we would not find ourselves scrambling for the funds to restore what can be restored.

Think of the Superfund sites, a desperate and failed attempt to rectify the damage done by uncontrolled production of chemicals and dumping of the waste byproducts.  We should be smart enough to realize that the chemical industry was hardly an isolated problem.

I look at pictures like that accompanying the op-ed, with ancient mountains gouged to death.  I think of a song by Pete Seeger, written perhaps with a different intent, but still applicable.  It starts with a question:

Where have all the flowers gone?

And it ends all except the last verse with another question, identical or each of those verses:

When will they ever learn?

The final verse asks about graveyards, and their disappearing.  In the song, the flowers come back to cover the graveyards . . .  and the loss of memory implied therein leads to a similarly implied repetition of the cycle.  

That will not be true with the mountains, the streams, the trees, the shrubs, the birds.

That last verse rephrases the question that is the refrain throughout the song:  When will we ever learn?

When will we?  

How many more mountains will be blown apart?

How many more streams will be buried?

How much longer will this destruction of our common natural heritage  be allowed to continue unabated, despite the law, so that some can continue to amass wealth at an obscene rate and an even more obscene cost to the rest of us?

Congress is not in session.  Thus even those Members and Senators who do regularly read the Post and perhaps do glance at the op-ed pages are not likely to see this column.

Force them to read it.

Pass it on to their staff.

If you have their private emails, send it to them.

But there is more you can do.  Much more.

Stop wasting electricity.  Reducing our wasteful use of electricity will reduce the demand for coal, much of which goes to power production.

Turn off your lights.

Remove tvs and computers from standby.

Unplug cell phone recharters.

Turn up the thermostat for your AC.

Close your refrigerator and freezer doors.

All of this will not be enough.  We have to persuade others, not just our politicians, but our friends, family and neighbors.

Make sure they also see the RFK Jr. piece.

Make sure they know the real costs of what is happening.

Then, maybe, we can persuade our president that it is not just the hearts of the people in Appalachia that are breaking.  It is the heart of Appalachia itself, the mountains and the streams.

Peace?

a suggestion from A Siegel in the thread at Daily Kos:

Might I suggest ...

putting a link to Devilstower on this?  Such as Mountaintop Day, where he calls on people to call on President Obama to visit MTR sites.

And, as an easy action, calls on people to twitter this call:  "Visit the mountains before they're gone, Mr President #stopmtr"  Or something like that.

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I remind people of the words of FDR: (0.00 / 0)
"I agree with you, I want to do it, now make me do it."

If we want action on this key issue, it is incumbent upon us to speak out, to take action, so that a President who agrees with us has to act in accordance with that agreement.

Peace.

This is my world and welcome to it


Perhaps we should invite (0.00 / 0)
the former RK blogger called Faithful to re-institute the "Mountain Monday" columns.

"One person, one vote" died at the hands of SCOTUS, January 21, 2010

Driving through WV (0.00 / 0)
Driving through WV one sees both great beauty and also heartbreaking ghosts of vistas now gone.  The canary has already flown to these open air minefields, our nation's mountain tops.  And their song tells us it's almost too late. As the saying goes, "Do something!"


"One person, one vote" died at the hands of SCOTUS, January 21, 2010

Yet another example (0.00 / 0)
of the free market philosophy at work.  You say:

For too long we have not required proper costing of ecological impact, any more than we have included in the price of our food and beverage the long-term medical costs they impose "downstream"

Well, of course, because there are no formulae in Milton Freidman's Free Market Bible to cover such costs.  They are, indeed, explicitly ignored. It is all about short-term bottom line individual profits for the economic man who is making personally beneficial decisions, worked out by the market capitalism for which Friedman so effectively lobbied, and which became the entire guidance system for the World Bank, Wall Street, and globalization.

Any so-called problems are supposed to be worked out by the mysterious unseen hand of the unregulated free market.... but there is no way to integrate those environmental and medical costs into the free market operation---- therefore, any attempt to do so by those squishy damned liberals must be violently resisted as heresy.  

Until we kill off the free market religion and replace it with something better to guide policy, we will not be able to stop the industrial and commercial rape. Obama will have to peel off those of his advisors who are Free Market acolytes (Geithner, Summers?).


Let's remember what FDR meant: (0.00 / 0)

As I dimly recall the story, that famous obiter dicta arose from a strong case advanced by Eleanor and (for her) an unlikely but welcome ally, Louis Howe, whose hitherto lifelong penchant had been for hardheaded political pragmatism and not visionary idealism, for building small, self-sustaining workers' towns/colonies like Arthurdale in Preston County, WV.

What FDR meant was, "Go forth and make it necessary for me spend political capital on this lovely, worthy program."

That meant making the program visible and garnering enough popular support for it that it had momentum, the kind of momentum that would make a significant part of the public say, "Oh, good," and, equally if not more important, making key members of Congress say, "I have much more to lose by not supporting this I gain from opposing it."

That meant getting beaucoups publicity for the program and building popular support in key districts. That meant being organized and having top-down support intersect with bottom-up pressure and good, old-fashioned, grassroots agitprop.

Today, when this form of pressure is advocated to make President Obama do things he wants to do and endorsed in his campaign, it sometimes (often, in fact) takes on a mostly negative aspect: ultimatums (do this and do it now or we'll hold our noses and not give you anymore money!) and thermonuclear name-calling: fraud, sell-out, recalcitrant, implacable enemy of the good and righteous forces of progress, and so on.

Yes, aspects of that kind of hardball are part of the "making it me do it" strategy, but it tends to be the least effective part of it. Since it risks eroding political-party-based-and-ideological consensus while also seriously pissing off some needed allies, not the least of whom would be the presdient and his supporters.
I see ending DADT as the ripest issue just now for "making the President do it." For obvious reasons.

Mountaintop removal has enormous potential, but IMO it's going to be a harder nut to crack. Not impossible, but it certainly doesn't have the critical, tipping point mass and national momentum that ending DADT has.  


Why do I get (0.00 / 0)
an impression that the overall impact of the article is: mountaintop mining has been a problem for more than 40yrs, but that's just a bit of irrelevant background. What's really, really, important is that Obama (The One!) hasn't fixed it yet, even though he's been a president for whole six months, and has had nothing else to do in that time. It's all Obama's fault that the Appalachians' hearts are broken...

Is Bobby Kennedy Jr a PUMA? Maybe, maybe not. But he's, certainly, a "selective environmentalist"; wind farms are terrific, as long as they're not in my backyard is his position, IIRC...

Thought it was worth remembering, before we get all weepy and outraged and start nodding our heads in unison.


Are you questioning RFK Jr's credentials? (0.00 / 0)
RFK Jr knows what he is talking about. He has about 20 years experience in the environmental field.

Thank you TeacherKen for another excellent topic. Your Sorensen training has paid off, doing another thoughtful analysis without the emotional and fear context we get from right wing Republicans.


[ Parent ]
I don't question Bobby Jr's credibility when it comes to (0.00 / 0)
justice for miners and for mining industry reform. He can lay complete and honorable claim to continuing proudly in his father's footsteps on those issues. In the old days anyway, before WV turned vermillion in national politics, the Kennedys were a powerful force in that state, going back, of course, to the 1960 primary victory over Humphrey.

And Bobby as we all know had a powerful connection to the white working class that, after his death, increasingly were peeled away from Democratic Party liberalism and ultimately came to be known as "Reagan Democrats." Some of that had to do with liberalism's focus on identity and gender politics in the 1970s and some of it had to do with race and some with the party's fierce internal debate over the Communist containment premises of Cold War foreign policy in the aftermath of Vietnam. And, of course, a lot of it had to do with the Republican Right's skill in manipulating white blue collar voters with divisive socio-cultural wedge issues. For his part, Bobby Jr. has written extensively about MTR and visited WV fairly often over the years. His sincerity and passion on issues related to justice for miners and, yes, even the mountains themselves simply cannot be questioned.  

But at the same time, I can say with absolute certainty that in my neck of the Appalachian woods, any mention of the Kennedys and environmental policy and astute conservatives promptly chortle derisively and say, "Wind power NIMBY's. Next?"


[ Parent ]
And here's a golden (not so) oldie from kos (0.00 / 0)
illustrating Bobby Jr.'s abiding passion. It was titled:

BOMBSHELL: RFK Jr. Testimony on Bush's Mountaintop Removal Antics  

http://www.dailykos.com/storyo...


[ Parent ]
Coal State Democrats like Byrd & Rockefeller (0.00 / 0)
in WV have already broken with the administration on cap and trade. I certainly can see putting pressure on the administration to let the president and his people know that there is (mounting, I hope) outrage over MTR, a venal practice which produces only a fraction of domestic coal, but it would hardly be prudent for Obama in his first year, with health care and energy now crucially topping his agenda, to gratuitously piss people like that off, and perhaps piss them off irrevocably.

Besides, if a liberal like Senator Jay Rockefeller (who also chairs the rather important commerce committee these days and is one of the best people we have in Congress on a meaningful public option component for health care) can't or won't even support a diluted cap-and-trade initiative, how unlikely is federal legislation banning MTR in the forseeable future?

As I said on dailykos yesterday, it would be extremely helpful if the influential teevee progressives, Keith, Rachel and Ed Schultze, began devoting some substantial airtime to this issue. For now at any rate, it simply isn't on their radar the way LGBT, detention, torture and Bush administration crimes are. I'm not saying those aren't eminently worthy progressive priorities, but MTR is arguably every bit as gut-wrenchingly appalling as torture. If it isn't, it's certainly in the ballpark.  


[ Parent ]
Recent Comments

Recent Diaries
Unintended Consequences
by: Elaine in Roanoke - Feb 03
3 Comments
Jim Crow Policing
by: teacherken - Feb 02
3 Comments

Blue Commonwealth is a community forum for the discussion of political issues of interest to Virginians.
The opinions expressed by users of this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Blue Commonwealth or its editors.
Powered by: SoapBlox