Blue Commonwealth Logo

Advanced Search

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

Become a Supporter
Like Blue Commonwealth? Want to help keep it running?
Contribute Today, and help keep our blog ad free!

Blog Roll
7 West
Albo Must Go
Anonymous is a Woman
Article XI
Assembly Access
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Blue Ridge Data
Blue Virginia
Byrne-ing Up the Internet
Central VA Progressive
Coarse Cracked Corn
The Daily Dogwood
Dem Bones
Equality Loudoun
Fairfax City Dems
WaPo - The Fix
Getting Around
Great Blue Heron
The Green Miles
Heartland of Va
Leesburg Tomorrow
Left of the Hill
New Dominion Project
Not Larry Sabato
Ox Road South Blog
Penning Thoughts
Powhatan Democrats
Renaissance Ruminations
River City Rapids
Rule .303
Shad Plank
Southeast Virginia
Star City Harbinger
Too Progressive
United States of Jamerica
VB Dems
VB Progressives
Virginia Dem
The Virginia Democrat
WaPo - Virginia Politics Blog
Vivian Paige
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll

Cuccinelli: Our Right-Wing Don Quixote

by: Elaine in Roanoke

Wed Mar 24, 2010 at 16:15:17 PM EDT

It only took minutes after health-care legislation was signed into law by President Barack Obama for Ken Cuccinelli to file his bogus lawsuit against the Federal government. State Solicitor General E. Duncan Getchell Jr. and Deputy Attorney General Wesley G. Russell Jr. filed his complaint in U.S. District Court in Richmond.

I absolutely agree with David Mills, executive director of the Virginia Democratic Party, who said the attorney general's office is being used as a "piggy bank for Ken Cuccinelli's political agenda." I might have worded it a bit stronger, but Mills is right on target.

Del. David L. Englin (D-Alexandria) decided to give people a way to fight back. He said, "This is an egregious waste of taxpayer dollars...[Cuccinelli] claims he's received nothing but positive feedback from Virginians, but I have constituents call me every day asking what they can do to oppose Cuccinelli's efforts."

So, Englin has started an online way for Virginians to tell Cuccinelli they oppose his action. A website ( has been set up that will directly connect you with the office of the attorney general.

Cuccinelli's waste of tax money is simply the latest in a long history of recalcitrant reactionaries trying to use the courts to sabotage social progress.  

Elaine in Roanoke :: Cuccinelli: Our Right-Wing Don Quixote
Social Security also faced a court challenge on its constitutionality. A conservative Supreme Court, which had been the bane of the FDR  administration's efforts to combat the effects of the Depression, still upheld the act's constitutionality by a 6-3 vote.

Thomas Eliot, who served as a special counsel to the committee which drafted the bill in 1933-34, has written about the opposition and harsh criticism that swirled around the proposed legislation.

"Hostile newspapers - which comprised most of the press - promptly assailed the new bill as a hodgepodge, an ill-drafted legislative monstrosity...The chief complaint was that various subjects were scattered throughout the measure...They [actually] objected to substance, not form." Eliot said.

That sounds familiar.

It was two years after the 1935 passage of Social Security when the Supreme Court finally upheld its constitutionality, using the authority given to the Federal government to "tax and spend for the general welfare."

The Voting Rights Act of 1965, which President Lyndon Johnson correctly realized would mean Democrats would lose racists in the South to the Republicans, also faced legal challenges supposedly based on the Constitution.

In 1966 South Carolina brought suit, South Carolina v Katzenbach, contending that the Voting Rights Act, which forced southern states to end their denial of voting rights to minority citizens through the use of "literacy tests" and poll taxes. was not constitutional.

The Supreme Court held that the federal government had a right to enforce the 15th Amendment through legal means, denying South Carolina's claims.

So, it seems that each time the Federal government attempts to make life better for the average American through legislative action, it  faces conservative criticism and attempts to sabotage it in the courts. Ken Cuccinelli is simply joining a long line of bigots and elitists who try to stifle progress.

Cuccinelli rails against the government mandating an individual buy health insurance, have it provided through an employers, or - failing either one - to pay a fine. He says that is not constitutional, even though it is a Republican idea.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who voted against health care reform in part he says because of that mandate, a month earlier, in response being asked how more people could become covered, said he was FOR an individual mandate.

Grassley told Fox News, "There isn't anything wrong with [an individual mandate], except some people look at it as an infringement upon individual freedom. But when it comes to states requiring it for automobile insurance, the principle then ought to lie the same way for health insurance...If you aren't insured, there's no free lunch. Somebody else is paying for it. I believe that there is a bipartisan consensus to have individual mandates."

Grassley is certainly not the only Republican who has done a "180" on a personal mandate. When the Clinton administration tried to reform our health care system, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), who now calls an individual mandate an unlawful limit on personal freedom, supported a bill that would have required such a mandate.

Heck, the whole concept of such a mandate was the idea of a Republican, a guy named Mark Pauly, who worked for George H.W. Bush.

Ah, but that was then and this is now. Plus, Virginia now has a bonafide right-wing nut for attorney general. Indeed, if Ken Cuccinelli actually were to get his way, not only would the bill just signed be deemed unconstitutional, but so would Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP.

So, "Kookinelli" must be trying to deny health care to over one half of the population who are served by these programs. That is crazy. But, that is actually what he is saying he wants.

Talk about touching a third rail!

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
He's running
for Governor, like the rest (12) of them. "Funny", how that number (12+1) got perverted in our times...

I think he gives
Don Quixote a bad rap.

"One person, one vote" died at the hands of SCOTUS, January 21, 2010

Recent Comments

Blue Commonwealth is a community forum for the discussion of political issues of interest to Virginians.
The opinions expressed by users of this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Blue Commonwealth or its editors.
Powered by: SoapBlox