Blue Commonwealth Logo

Advanced Search
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Become a Supporter
Like Blue Commonwealth? Want to help keep it running?
Contribute Today, and help keep our blog ad free!




Blog Roll
7 West
Albo Must Go
Anonymous is a Woman
Anti-BVBL
Article XI
Assembly Access
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Blacknell
Blue Ridge Data
Blue Virginia
Blueweeds
Byrne-ing Up the Internet
Central VA Progressive
ChangeServant
Coarse Cracked Corn
CobaltVA
CvilleDave
The Daily Dogwood
Dem Bones
DemocracyUpsideDown
DemRulz
Equality Loudoun
Fairfax City Dems
WaPo - The Fix
Fred2Blue
Getting Around
Great Blue Heron
The Green Miles
Heartland of Va
Leesburg Tomorrow
Left of the Hill
New Dominion Project
Not Larry Sabato
Ox Road South Blog
Penning Thoughts
Powhatan Democrats
Renaissance Ruminations
River City Rapids
Rule .303
RockDem
Shad Plank
Sisyphus
SlantBlog
Southeast Virginia
Star City Harbinger
Tokatakiya
Too Progressive
United States of Jamerica
VB Dems
VB Progressives
Virginia Dem
The Virginia Democrat
WaPo - Virginia Politics Blog
Vivian Paige
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll
xcurmudgeon

A Social Security Grandstand Which Toys With Seniors

by: KathyinBlacksburg

Sat Feb 06, 2010 at 13:05:12 PM EST


It is said that the road to hell is  paved with good intentions (which often backfire).  What I write about today isn't even euphemistically qualified under the label of  "good intentions."   It is far more convoluted than that.  Instead our House leaders have conjured up a reckless ploy.  They are playing with fire, and our lives, those of us who depend upon Social Security checks, small as many of them are (including mine).  Here's what's up.

In a move described here, designed to embarrass Republicans, Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer are poised to force a vote on a resolution opposing the privatization of Social Security.  They think they can shame the No-Shame players, who fill the ranks of the Republican House Caucus.  But they cannot.  


House Democrats are going to force their Republican colleagues to vote on a resolution opposing the privatization of Social Security. The move shows Democrats are putting their full political muscle into painting the Republicans as enemies of Social Security and using the chief GOP budget writer Rep. Paul Ryan's plan to cut benefits as evidence.
KathyinBlacksburg :: A Social Security Grandstand Which Toys With Seniors
Here is more about the language of the resolution.  

The resolution wouldn't have the legislative authority to repeal Social Security should the vote go badly.  And I assume Speaker Pelosi is confident of the votes.  However, there are some limitations to what she can accomplish and some perils if she fails.  

It's possible that the Democratic leadership is a bit over-confident and may be left explaining why they thought this was a "good" idea.  Blue Dogs sometimes don't behave in predictable ways.  And some of them are all too predictably against Social Security anyway.  As Americans dig themselves out of the biggest recession since the Great Depression, they should not have to worry that momentum, of both a GOP and Blue Dog kind, could be building against them.

No, this is not a good time, if there ever is one, to needlessly frighten seniors, or those who, while just short of retirement age, have lost their jobs. Nor is it a good time to frighten the young who must now question whether they will ever be secure when they are too old and frail to work outside the home, or who no longer fit the youthful prototype of the "desirable" worker.

Wall Street has left most Americans with little to survive on in their older years.  Imagine how much worse off would be Americans who by the millions lost their jobs and much of their pension value.  The last thing Americans need is to hand over the one secure piece of their survival to Wall Street.  The best thing we can do for all generations is to shore up and increase the security of all three financial prongs to secure older years: 1) A strengthened public Social Security System; 2) a safer private pension system; and 3) private savings secured by making banks and Wall St. more responsible. It is an intergenerational pact we make with those both older and younger than we.  Those of us who have worked to earn our Social Security, support efforts to strengthen the system well beyond our life expectancy, so that our parents will be free from worry and our children and their children have a system worth having and worthy of them one day.  

Please write to Pelosi and Hoyer here and here.  Our financial security should not be toyed with.  That is true even if shaming the GOP seems very enticing.  

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I'm glad for this. (0.00 / 0)
And the reason why is that Social Security, despite its problems, is one of the most popular programs in America. To force this vote is one hell of a gamble but if it works, it has the effect of lining those who voted against it up against a wall for the political firing squad. There are far fewer people who support privatization than the far right thinks there are. You are right that it is dangerous to call this vote but it is about damn time this party got some balls and fought for our future, even if it is gambling.

Here's the reaction of the (0.00 / 0)
White House Blog:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog...

And there's more at Talking Points Memo
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo...

"One person, one vote" died at the hands of SCOTUS, January 21, 2010


The links you provide (0.00 / 0)
are the reaction to the "Shelby Shakedown" -- Shelby's blanket hold on Obama's nominations. Nothing to do with Social Security resolution in the House.

And I don't see what is so senior-frightening about that resolution. Personally, I think that non-binding resolutions are a waste of time but, if we're going to engage in theatrics (and we will, since Repubs keep pushing all manners of stupid resolutions, some of which are actually voted on), this one is better than most. What the seniors need to be aware (and frightened) of is the Repub "budget", which plans on cutting both Medicare and Social Security (and still leaves us as deeply in financial doo-doo as ever, till 2083). The resolution might, hopefully, bring the seniors that awareness. We want them to be screeching bloody murder into every Repub (and Blue Dog) phone. And we want the SOBs on record as to where they stand.

It's not about shaming the Repubs; as you say, that would be impossible, since only honourable people are capable of being ashamed of their less-than-honourable behaviour. But they just might be "out-stared"... While many seniors tend to be the poorest segment of the society, there are also many of them in the richest echelons. And they tend to not only provide a reliable vote but to open (or not) their purses to their favoured politicians.


[ Parent ]
The risk (0.00 / 0)
is that the ploy goes the other way and fires up the Pete Peterson crowd who want to gut all the important programs we have on behalf of corporations, the wealthy, and various Ayn Rand fiction readers.  It could bring unintended momentum in the wrong direction.  

"One person, one vote" died at the hands of SCOTUS, January 21, 2010

[ Parent ]
Also sorry I posted the link in the reply to the wrong article. n/t (0.00 / 0)


"One person, one vote" died at the hands of SCOTUS, January 21, 2010

[ Parent ]
Recent Comments

Recent Diaries
Lemmings and Sheep
by: Teddy Goodson - Mar 09
1 Comments
Health Care and Abortion
by: SumofChange - Mar 06
1 Comments
Reflection
by: teacherken - Mar 06
2 Comments
Krugman - forget about Bunning
by: teacherken - Mar 05
2 Comments

Blue Commonwealth is a community forum for the discussion of political issues of interest to Virginians.
The opinions expressed by users of this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Blue Commonwealth or its editors.
Powered by: SoapBlox