Blue Commonwealth Logo

Advanced Search
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Become a Supporter
Like Blue Commonwealth? Want to help keep it running?
Contribute Today, and help keep our blog ad free!




Blog Roll
7 West
Albo Must Go
Anonymous is a Woman
Anti-BVBL
Article XI
Assembly Access
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Blacknell
Blue Ridge Data
Blue Virginia
Blueweeds
Byrne-ing Up the Internet
Central VA Progressive
ChangeServant
Coarse Cracked Corn
CobaltVA
CvilleDave
The Daily Dogwood
Dem Bones
DemocracyUpsideDown
DemRulz
Equality Loudoun
Fairfax City Dems
WaPo - The Fix
Fred2Blue
Getting Around
Great Blue Heron
The Green Miles
Heartland of Va
Leesburg Tomorrow
Left of the Hill
New Dominion Project
Not Larry Sabato
Ox Road South Blog
Penning Thoughts
Powhatan Democrats
Renaissance Ruminations
River City Rapids
Rule .303
RockDem
Shad Plank
Sisyphus
SlantBlog
Southeast Virginia
Star City Harbinger
Tokatakiya
Too Progressive
United States of Jamerica
VB Dems
VB Progressives
Virginia Dem
The Virginia Democrat
WaPo - Virginia Politics Blog
Vivian Paige
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll
xcurmudgeon

A Blanket Hold on All Nominations

by: KathyinBlacksburg

Fri Feb 05, 2010 at 17:52:37 PM EST


In the real world (that is outside the LaLaLand of the Senate), this would be called what it is.  But not in the Senate.  We citizens have gown too accustomed to it.  And as a consequence, there have been increasing efforts to bring government to a standstill.  It happened in the case of the new TSA nomination. The Senate republicans would not "allow" a vote on the President's nominee. And TSA was without its leader when the "Shoe Bomber" attempted to take down a plane.  It happened also when Ben Nelson demanded special treatment or he'll kill health care reform.  It went over so poorly, Ben Nelson tried after the fact to kill his own perverse amendment.  Mary Landrieu demanded special treatment for LA, or else.  Blanche Lincoln's contortions, rationalizations, and obstructionism were designed to give her singualar authority over health care (and a lot more). (Did you know she wrote her constituents suggesting she stood up to the President?"  Now we see that the Senate "can vote on no more Obama nominations."  Not one.  The Imperial Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL) has so decreed.  70 nominations have ground to a halt. It has come to this.  

Sen. Richard Shelby's (R-Ala.) decision to place a "blanket hold" on all presidential nominations until a pair of billion-dollar earmarks for his home state are fast-tracked has reignited the debate over the parliamentary tactics being deployed by the Republican Party. It also has thrust into the spotlight the clout that major defense contractors often yield on the political process.

Read more here.

KathyinBlacksburg :: A Blanket Hold on All Nominations
Here's the question:  When will the Senate put an end to this? Why don't they?  Ah! There is the rub.  They do not because each and every one thinks he or she might want to do likewise and blackmail the entire Senate, you know, bring it to a grinding halt.

Wanted: Some good Senators to create the momentum to end this practice.  There is no Constitutional right for Shelby to grind all nominations (and hypothetically, everything) to a halt.  

Harry Reid should use the power he has to put a de-facto end to the nonsense.  Show you have the moxie, Senator.  I call upon you to show you care more about the business of the people than this obstruction without end.   Announce to the country what Richard Shelby has done.  Tell the people that the law does not protect such manipulation.  Let Shelby twist in the sunlight of public scrutiny.  Push the footage everywhere.  Let the voters see the Republicans' obstruction (and worse) right before their eyes.  And see GOP favorability ratings sink even further.  The GOP has only two words to its "credit": "No" and nothing.  Reid should stop hiding under the cloak of a supposedly required "supermajority."  Richard Shelby should be ejected from the Senate.  So too should any other Senator who demands payment, or else.  What can you do?  Write your Senator.  Demand an end to the obstruction by either party.  Tell Your Senator to hold hearings on Shelby's stunt.  Use him as an example.  Bring this unsavory unitary Senator "rule" to an end.

PS As for health care.  It has passed both houses.  Reconciliation is not only the right process to use to wrap it up, it is the process historically used.  

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
DNC TV ad (0.00 / 0)

Example posted on DailyKos. Comments pointed out the ad was scarcely hard-hitting, since it did not call the nominees "hostages," which is what they are. However, considering this was produced by Tim Kaine's new outfit, it is pretty hard-hitting, eh?
Wonder if they can persuade Fox to run the ad.


Out of patience (0.00 / 0)
It boggles the mind that the Democrats are nt trumpeting this attack on national security. Republicans would rather the country be destroyed than they permit the Democrats to govern---- and they pretend that Obama is in cahoots with terrorists. Looks more as though Republicans are in cahoots with terrorists, which is a whole lot worse than palling around with terrorists, wouldn't you say?

Things are so bad that (0.00 / 0)
filibuster (pocket hold) is equated to an actual filibuster, so the one making the threat is spared the spotlight on him or her showing what they are and what they do.  

"One person, one vote" died at the hands of SCOTUS, January 21, 2010

[ Parent ]
Senate Rules Destroy Democracy (0.00 / 0)
The rules of the Senate regularly ruin representative democracy. It's bad enough that North Dakota has the same representation in that body as California, but the rules that allow one senator to stop action with a "hold" and the pretense that the filibuster rule means every piece of legislation needs a supermajority to get to a vote is a disaster.

[ Parent ]
Contempt for Obama and for America (0.00 / 0)
is what Senator Shelby shows, now that I think about it. He has demonstrated complete lack of respect for the President of his own country, elected by the people of his own country.  When he parades about saying he is working for his constituents, it is a lie because he games the system by stopping all nominations relating to national security (the first time in history such massive retaliation has happened)----- one asks: are his own constituents not worth protecting by having a full complement of appointees in place? I suspect Shelby is one of those nutcases which does not believe Obama is legitimately elected (either Barack is not a citizen, or ACORN stole the election for him; about a third of Republicans believes thee two lies).

Shelby should be impeached for derelection of duty.

He certainly should not be rewarded by yielding to his demands, nor should he be permitted to bring the Senate to a halt and the government to its knees by such extortion. Harry Reid is going to have to use ju jitsu on the jerk however is convenient (or be replaced himself).


Obama should resort to an Omnibus Recess Appointment (4.00 / 1)
From todays Washington Post:

"But, in fact, Obama and the Democrats can do something.

In particular, Obama can do what every one of his recent predecessors has done when their nominees have not been confirmed in the Senate -- appoint them for an abbreviated term (good until the next Senate is convened in 2011) when the Senate stands in recess (as it next will over the President's Day weekend). This procedure, called recess appointment, has been used relatively sparingly in the past because senators were relatively sparing in putting holds on nominees. But if the new normal in the Senate is the omnibus hold, the new normal in the White House should become the omnibus recess appointment.

Ironically, perhaps, the effect of such omnibusism would be to circumvent, legally, the constitution's conferring of advise-and-consent powers to the Senate on the president's nominees. But in its current state, the Senate -- its Republican minority more particularly -- neither advises nor consents. It simply obstructs, requiring the rest of the government to go around it if we're to have a government at all."

By Harold Meyerson  |  February 5, 2010; 4:50 PM ET


Here is the White House Reaction (0.00 / 0)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog...

And here's more at TPM.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo...

Note: I had previously and inadvertently attached this to the wrong article.

"One person, one vote" died at the hands of SCOTUS, January 21, 2010


Recent Comments

Recent Diaries
Lemmings and Sheep
by: Teddy Goodson - Mar 09
1 Comments
Health Care and Abortion
by: SumofChange - Mar 06
1 Comments
Reflection
by: teacherken - Mar 06
2 Comments
Krugman - forget about Bunning
by: teacherken - Mar 05
2 Comments

Blue Commonwealth is a community forum for the discussion of political issues of interest to Virginians.
The opinions expressed by users of this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Blue Commonwealth or its editors.
Powered by: SoapBlox