Blue Commonwealth Logo

Advanced Search

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

Become a Supporter
Like Blue Commonwealth? Want to help keep it running?
Contribute Today, and help keep our blog ad free!

Blog Roll
7 West
Albo Must Go
Anonymous is a Woman
Article XI
Assembly Access
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Blue Ridge Data
Blue Virginia
Byrne-ing Up the Internet
Central VA Progressive
Coarse Cracked Corn
The Daily Dogwood
Dem Bones
Equality Loudoun
Fairfax City Dems
WaPo - The Fix
Getting Around
Great Blue Heron
The Green Miles
Heartland of Va
Leesburg Tomorrow
Left of the Hill
New Dominion Project
Not Larry Sabato
Ox Road South Blog
Penning Thoughts
Powhatan Democrats
Renaissance Ruminations
River City Rapids
Rule .303
Shad Plank
Southeast Virginia
Star City Harbinger
Too Progressive
United States of Jamerica
VB Dems
VB Progressives
Virginia Dem
The Virginia Democrat
WaPo - Virginia Politics Blog
Vivian Paige
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll

Lobbyists Kicked Off Advisory Panels

by: Teddy Goodson

Fri Nov 27, 2009 at 11:20:10 AM EST

Thousands of lobbyists are being swept off federal advisory panels thanks to a policy initiated quietly by President Obama at the instigation of White House ethics counsel Norm Eisen.  Eisen disclosed the policy on the White Houe blog last September, saying:
"Some folks have developed a comfortable Beltway perch sitting on these boards while at the same time working as lobbyists to influence the government"

The General Services Administration has estimated the number of advisory committees at  915 with over 60,000 members, but no one knows for sure. The committees no doubt seemed like a good idea back in the early 1970's when Congress followed the recommendations of Robert Vastine, a top Republican staffer at the time, and passed the Federal Advisory Committee Act apparently hoping to provide Congress, composed mostly of laymen, with guidance from professionals in dealing with the confusions of modern life. From simple beginnings the advisory committees have turned into what Vastine, now a lobbyist for the Coalition of Service Industries, frankly calls a "bureaucratic labyrinth" inter-twined with every aspect of federal government, including helping to write legislation and regulations or advising on the letting of government contracts.

Teddy Goodson :: Lobbyists Kicked Off Advisory Panels
Needless to say, the K Street community of lobbyists has protested mightily, with the loudest complaints coming from the ITACs or Industry Trade Advisory Committees, whose 400 members include at least 130 lobbyists. The general point of their argument is that removing lobbyists from the advisory committees will "undermine the utility of the advisory committee process... the characteristics that make many Advisors valuable to the Administration (are) the same characteristics that... artificially disqualify them from participation..." (Quoted from a letter from committee chairs to POTUS).

Mr. Vastine explained, "It's taken me years to learn what the General Agreement on Tarriffs and Trade is." Brian T. Petty, senior vice-president for government affairs (they must have a stable of vice-presidents in this department) at the International Association of Drilling Contractors, commented,

"At least for a year and maybe longer... we will completely neuter the voice of American business... You are clearing out some of the most competent people."

The Obama Administration calls the criticism "overblown," pointing out that top corporate officers are free to sit on the advisory panels so long as they are not lobbyists, adding that "arguments that only lobbyists can bring requisite experience to provide wise counsel... are unconvincing on their face."  Eisen himself claimed that "It's healthy to move away from the professional advocates for the special interests and let some new voices be heard."

Advocates for good government, like Mary Boyle, Vice-President at Common Cause, says,

"You may lose a lot of expertise, but these people are also paid to have a point of view; they have an agenda... We support what the Administration is doing to get deep-seated special interests out of the business of running our government..."

The new policy might turn out to be the most far-reaching lobbying rule change so far from an Administration that campaigned on restricting the power of special interest lobbyists. Looks like a home run to me.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
He Won't Get Credit
I fully expect the GOPers to scream that he is making the crafting of legislation impossible; meanwhile, some on the Democratic left will probably say it doesn't change things enough.

Already, I have read a comment on the Washington Post site that this is simply a sop to cover the increase in troops for Afghanistan...even though the president campaigned on doing exactly this reform for government agencies.

I expect GOPers to act like Neanderthals. What gets me are the lefties who would rather have purity than to have better government.

This president can't win for winning. I agree with you. This is a home run.  

Sounds like welcome
change.  Maybe even change we can believe in.  "Expertise" like that (which favors industry at the expense of everyone else) is "expertise" we should loose.

"One person, one vote" died at the hands of SCOTUS, January 21, 2010

I just hope
that he sticks with it, no matter how much the GOPers (and some Dems, doubtless) scream. If, however, this wonderful, sweeping change is followed up by a wave of individual waivers (no lobbyists in general, but this one and that one are OK), I'm gonna barf; hopes up, hopes down... I've been on this see-saw a bit too long already.

Recent Comments

Blue Commonwealth is a community forum for the discussion of political issues of interest to Virginians.
The opinions expressed by users of this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Blue Commonwealth or its editors.
Powered by: SoapBlox