Blue Commonwealth Logo

Advanced Search
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Become a Supporter
Like Blue Commonwealth? Want to help keep it running?
Contribute Today, and help keep our blog ad free!




Blog Roll
7 West
Albo Must Go
Anonymous is a Woman
Anti-BVBL
Article XI
Assembly Access
Augusta Free Press
Bacon's Rebellion
Blacknell
Blue Ridge Data
Blue Virginia
Blueweeds
Byrne-ing Up the Internet
Central VA Progressive
ChangeServant
Coarse Cracked Corn
CobaltVA
CvilleDave
The Daily Dogwood
Dem Bones
DemocracyUpsideDown
DemRulz
Equality Loudoun
Fairfax City Dems
WaPo - The Fix
Fred2Blue
Getting Around
Great Blue Heron
The Green Miles
Heartland of Va
Leesburg Tomorrow
Left of the Hill
New Dominion Project
Not Larry Sabato
Ox Road South Blog
Penning Thoughts
Powhatan Democrats
Renaissance Ruminations
River City Rapids
Rule .303
RockDem
Shad Plank
Sisyphus
SlantBlog
Southeast Virginia
Star City Harbinger
Tokatakiya
Too Progressive
United States of Jamerica
VB Dems
VB Progressives
Virginia Dem
The Virginia Democrat
WaPo - Virginia Politics Blog
Vivian Paige
Waldo Jaquith
Waldo's VA Political Blogroll
xcurmudgeon

Washington Post: Mr. Deeds for Governor

by: teacherken

Sat Oct 17, 2009 at 19:51:58 PM EDT


the subtitle of the endorsement reads His transportation realism and Mr. McDonnell's bogus roads plan present Virginians with a stark choice on Nov. 3.

This is one week earlier than the Post endorsement the past two gubernatorial cycles.  It will be interesting to see its impact.

In the meantime, join me below for highlights of the piece, which concludes

Mr. Deeds, lagging in the polls, lacks Mr. McDonnell's knack for crisp articulation. But if he has not always been the most adroit advocate for astute policies, that is preferable to Mr. McDonnell's silver-tongued embrace of ideas that would mire Virginia in a traffic-clogged, backward-looking past. Virginians should not confuse Mr. McDonnell's adept oratory for wisdom, nor Mr. Deeds's plain speech for indirection. In fact, it is Mr. Deeds whose ideas hold the promise of a prosperous future.
teacherken :: Washington Post: Mr. Deeds for Governor
There is a LOT of focus on McDonnell's having persistently opposed the policies of Mark Warner and Tim Kaine that have gained Virginia its high reputation as the best-governed state, the best in which to do business, and so on.

The Post hammers on a number of points.  Let me offer a few snips to give a sense:

Mr. McDonnell has staked out the intolerant terrain on his party's right wing, fighting a culture war that seized his imagination as a law student in the Reagan era.

And rather than leveling with Virginians about the cost of his approach, as Mr. Deeds has done, Mr. McDonnell lacks the political spine to say what programs he would attempt to gut, or even reshape, in order to deal with transportation needs.

lacks the political spine -  ooh, that has to sting.

Why Creigh's Post op ed was so important:  

It is fantasy to think that the transportation funding problem, a generation in the making, will be addressed without a tax increase. A recent manifesto from 17 major business groups in Northern Virginia, calling for new taxes dedicated to transportation, attests to that reality.
 This is a point that the Deeds campaign should be hammering in advertisement in NoVa in the remaining 2+ weeks.

The Post notes Democratic criticism of the Deeds campaign for the focus on the negative, and not making the positive case for himself, and then offers

If so, it reflects a failure of campaign strategy and tactics, not a lack of raw material. In fact Mr. Deeds -- a decent, unusually self-effacing man who calls himself "a nobody from nowhere" -- has a compelling life story and an admirable record of achievement as a legislator from rural Bath County.

The editorial acknowledges McDonnell's skills as a politician, calling him "dextrous" at the same time emphasizing the difference on policy.  Let me quote again:

Based on his 14-year record as a lawmaker -- a record dominated by his focus on incendiary wedge issues -- we worry that Mr. McDonnell's Virginia would be one where abortion rights would be curtailed; where homosexuals would be treated as second-class citizens; where information about birth control would be hidden; and where the line between church and state could get awfully porous. That is a prescription for yesterday's Virginia, not tomorrow's.

Congratulations to Creigh Deeds on earning this strong endorsement.   Now let's all work together and go out and win this thing!

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
A very strong endorsement! (0.00 / 0)
The strength of this endorsement surprises me--not because it isn't accurate and well deserved, but because of the increasing conservatism of the WaPo ed. board under Fred Hiatt.  If any newspaper's backing could be a game-changer--and I'm not sure it can be anymore, if it ever could--this might fit the bill.

So congratulations, Creigh!  Here's some fresh momentum just when your campaign needs it most.  Now please, use this to issue a slew of positive ads in these final weeks!


course if you've been following the State Political Stories in the WaPo.... (0.00 / 0)
was it a shock or was it a surprise? Bob McDonnell, leads the negative stories about a candidate, 16 to 1.

The surprise (0.00 / 0)
Is popping the endorsement this far before the election.  The Post usually waits until the last week or the weekend before an election, doing it now is basically saying "Virginia, elect Creigh Deeds as governor, or you'll be royally screwed by Taliban Bob as Governor".  

Ever since Bush in 2000, when the newspapers didn't really take a strong position against him because most figured there was no way the US would elect an idiot such as him as President, they've been much more direct in their assessments.  This Post endorsement is very loud and very direct, with no need to parse it.  They think Taliban Bob would be an absolute disaster for the Commonwealth and want to make sure as many people come to understand that as possible.  Thus, the early, direct and fairly detailed endorsement of Creigh's candidacy.


[ Parent ]
normally endorse 9 days before election (0.00 / 0)
last two cycles, endorsements for Warner and Kaine fell2 Sundays before the election.  Thus this is one week earlier.

This is my world and welcome to it

[ Parent ]
Holy cow! (0.00 / 0)
Talk about "strong words"... I had to unearth my smelling salts :)

If only Creigh ran as good a campaign as the WashPo has been on his behalf (that's the third time they lent a helping hand -- endorsement before the primaries and Digging Up The Thesis being the first two), I'd not be losing sleep over this election.

Glad to see that WashPo is doing its best to atone for years of helping get us in the mess with their rightward skew. It may not be enough and it may be a tad too late, but...


Too little, too late...... (0.00 / 0)
Everyone makes such a big deal about the WaPo primary endorsement, but that's not why he won.  He won because he ran a great primary campaign.  WaPo got Deeds an outright win in NoVA when he otherwise might have only run a close 2nd or 3rd, or maybe won but much more narrowly, but it had no effect outside NoVA.  Deeds won the primary on his own, under Joe Abbey's great stewardship.

So it's a bit of a surprise that Creigh has run such a bad general election campaign.  It's what I feared last winter when I originally was leaning toward Moran or TMac, but I eventually decided to give Creigh the benefit of doubt that he would learn from his 2005 loss instead of repeat the same mistakes, and the primary campaign persuaded me that's just what Creigh was doing, LEARNING.

Now it's apparent that Creigh learned nothing about running a competent general election campaign and is just in over his head.

So here we are, about to crash, with Wagner and Shannon likely going down with the ship.

I just hope Vanderhye and so many other Dems survive.  They've run great campaigns independent of the statewide ticket, no doubt, so they'll outperform Deeds.


Enlighten me on these "2005 mistakes?" (0.00 / 0)
Like all Virginians, since the ticket isn't connected, and the last time there was a clean sweep for the Democrats, was in 1990, I just vote the ticket but don't pay any attention to it, since there's no commercials. What were Attorney General candidate Creigh Deeds's "mistakes?"  I'm a novice in the deeper politics of state politics.

[ Parent ]
The Post endorsement was huge for the primary win (0.00 / 0)
Ask the folks in the campaign back in May/June what they think of the endorsement.  It proved to be the focal point for his NoVA campaign in the last few weeks, and energized the rest of the state.  Did it win the primary for him?  Probably not, but did it make his landslide victory possible?  That I think it did.

This type of endorsement, though expected, is somewhat electric because of its message.  It's the type of thing than can lift NoVA Dem turnout by several points, and those several points will be very big in this type of election.  If Creigh can really hammer home a good, solid, "this is why you should vote for me" message in NoVA over the next two weeks, he'll swing 3-5 points his way on Election Night.  If he can do some pickup down in Tidewater and in Richmond, that's another few points pickup, and by then it's well into "either could win" territory.


[ Parent ]
Recent Comments

Recent Diaries
Lemmings and Sheep
by: Teddy Goodson - Mar 09
1 Comments
Health Care and Abortion
by: SumofChange - Mar 06
1 Comments
Reflection
by: teacherken - Mar 06
2 Comments
Krugman - forget about Bunning
by: teacherken - Mar 05
2 Comments

Blue Commonwealth is a community forum for the discussion of political issues of interest to Virginians.
The opinions expressed by users of this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Blue Commonwealth or its editors.
Powered by: SoapBlox